Religulous thesis

Historical perspectives[ edit ] An early form of mass antireligion was expressed during the Enlightenmentas early as the 17th century.

Religulous thesis

Customers who viewed this item also viewed

October 4, at I very much appreciated your openness and candor. To respond to your points: I am however currently in talks with distributors to libraries, public and universities. Hopefully something comes of that.

Religulous thesis

And in fact I would argue the opposite: They put their faith in traditional beliefs about the Bible—not in the texts themselves!

I think that a large problem with modern Religulous thesis and evangelical Christianity is that they rely on a traditional set of belief-claims about the Bible. And these long-standing belief-claims, which were largely formed devoid of any knowledge about this corpus of ancient texts, are used to define their faith, or faith in general.

And this is quite bizarre when we think about it: This is not how Paul, or Matthew, of James, etc. I have known and work with many biblical scholars who readily know that the Bible is a collection of diverse and often competing beliefs about a variety of topis, and attests competing ideologies, worldviews, and even theological beliefs.

I used to have a few Christians on the site who commented regularly and expressed their appreciation for my work. They too sought to define their faith in other ways than through faulty and unsupportable ideas about the text.

When studied, they reveal conflating authoritative voices, contradictory portraits of Yahweh, competing legislation, views of the priesthood, counter-histories, etc.

Antireligion is opposition to religion of any kind. The term has been used to describe opposition to organized religion, religious practices or religious vetconnexx.com term has also been used to describe opposition to specific forms of supernatural worship or practice, whether organized or vetconnexx.comtion to religion also goes beyond the misotheistic spectrum. The commercial has just quote mined. It's a dirty, rotten, low-down trick, one of The Oldest Ones in the Book, and is a subtrope of Blatant Lies and Weasel vetconnexx.comes commonly in sloppy rhetoric and propaganda pieces. Unfortunately, this usually works with an ill-informed audience, as the speaker can usually expect that they will not check the source for the quotes. Fallacies - Fallacies are all around us. Every time we turn on a TV, or a radio, or pick up a newspaper, we see or hear fallacies. According to vetconnexx.com, a fallacy is defined as a false notion, a statement or an argument based on a false or invalid inference, incorrectness of reasoning or belief; erroneousness, or the quality of being deceptive (vetconnexx.com).

First there are real and often severe discrepancies between the views and opinions of the 60 some scribes who composed these texts over an ever-changing religious and geopolitical world of some 1, years.

What I am particularly doing here is dismissing—to use your words—claims about this collection of ancient texts. I do not engage in the deconstruction of belief-claims about God in general or other such religious claims.

So this project here is vastly different than the fundamental aims of many atheists. Can showing how traditional belief-claims about the Bible are not supported by the biblical texts themselves lead to the questioning of other religious claims?

Yes I think so. But I leave my Christians readers to grapple with that on their own terms. To cite a couple excerpts from my book concerning these issues…. Let me back up a moment and clarify what I am saying and conversely not saying. First, this is not a book that argues against belief in God.

It is not a book that argues against faith in general. Rather, it is a book that argues against holding certain traditional beliefs about the texts of the Bible in a day and age when our knowledge about these ancient texts, about ancient literature in general, and about the historical and literary contexts within which these texts were composed reveals that such traditional beliefs are no longer tenable.

Because the biblical texts themselves tell us this.The commercial has just quote mined. It's a dirty, rotten, low-down trick, one of The Oldest Ones in the Book, and is a subtrope of Blatant Lies and Weasel vetconnexx.comes commonly in sloppy rhetoric and propaganda pieces.

Unfortunately, this usually works with an ill-informed audience, as the speaker can usually expect that they will not check the source for the quotes. Free fallacies papers, essays, and research papers. Fallacies In Advertising - Fallacies in Advertising According to Bassham et al.

(), a logical fallacy is “an argument that contains a . Download-Theses Mercredi 10 juin Movie Hub 2. vetconnexx.com Dec vetconnexx.com Nov vetconnexx.com Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for Religulous at vetconnexx.com Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our users.

The Christ myth theory (also known as the Jesus myth theory, Jesus mythicism, or Jesus ahistoricity theory) is the view that "the story of Jesus is a piece of mythology," possessing no "substantial claims to historical fact." Alternatively, in terms given by Bart Ehrman paraphrasing Earl Doherty, "the historical Jesus did not vetconnexx.com if he did, he had virtually nothing to do with the founding.

David Icke - Wikipedia