Nov 23, She still remembers the blue and purple fabric of that dress, but other memories from those years are more traumatic.
Background[ edit ] Soh was born in South Korea. She graduated from Sogang University in Seoul and earned her master's degree and then Ph.
D from the University of Hawaii in She is a sociocultural anthropologist who specializes in issues of women, gender, sexuality. Movement for Redress", which appeared in Asian Survey.
Soh wrote about how the sexist Korean patriarchal culture was a critical underlying factor in the criminal collaboration by Koreans in the Japanese comfort women program. This combined with the sense of shame about sex work to prevent the comfort women program from being investigated after the war.
In the s and later, the comfort women issue was not considered important by the government of South Korea because of the elitist tendency to ignore the plight of the poor; most of the coerced Koreans were from poor families. She asserts that Chong Dae Hyup's narrative of the Japanese military coercively taking young Korean women away from "loving parents" is baseless, and she accuses the activist group of strategic misrepresentations that have prevented deeper understanding of the comfort women issue.
She insists that it is incorrect to portray the comfort women as sex slaves and the system as a war crime. In her view, the burden is on Korean society to repudiate victimization, admit its complicity and accept that the comfort women system was not criminal.
However, she concedes that current Korean nationalism is so strong that it is highly unlikely Korean society will come to that realization anytime soon. To prevent this from occurring, the Japanese military asked businessmen to recruit prostitutes and operate brothels.
The Japanese military sent notices to brothel operators ordering them to only recruit willing prostitutes and not to recruit women against their will. The Japanese operators followed the order and only recruited willing women. But the Korean operators recruited both willing and unwilling women.
If Korean brothel operators had followed the Japanese military's order, there would not have been any comfort women issue.
When Japan offered compensation through Asian Women's Fund inSoh asserts that Chong Dae Hyup threatened Korean women not to accept Japan's apology and compensation so that it could continue its anti-Japanese propaganda campaign. Soh describes how 61 former Korean comfort women defied this threat and accepted compensation.
Those 61 women were vilified as traitors. Chong Dae Hyup published their names and addresses in newspapers as dirty prostitutes, so they had to live the rest of their lives in disgrace.
Furthermore, the Koreans turn their eyes away from their own collaboration. She asserts that the Korean comfort station operators recruited Korean comfort women, some of whom were sold to the operators by indebted parents.
But after the war Korean society stigmatized these women, exacerbating their tragedy. Soh criticizes the Korean Council for traumatizing those comfort women who accepted monetary compensation from the Japan-based Asian Women's Fund.
Kingston describes how the book places responsibility on Korean society for the Korean comfort women problem, even though Soh admits that the Japanese government established and managed the program.
Kingston observes that Soh is much more critical of liberal Korean redress activists than she is of conservative Japanese nationalist apologists who can use the book's arguments for their own purposes.
Caprioa professor of history at Rikkyo University in Tokyo, wrote that Soh's book emphasizes the complexity of the comfort women issue. The book describes how there are vastly different experiences of comfort women depending on how they were recruited and where they were stationed.
Soh works toward a more comprehensive definition of comfort women, rather than limiting the definition to a single characterization.
Caprio criticizes Soh for opening the door to Japanese nationalists who make "irresponsible claims" to minimize the comfort women issue.Essay on Korean Comfort Women Words 11 Pages Comfort women, or ianfu as they are called in Korean, are females who were forced sex slaves for the Japanese Imperial Army (Chunghee).
Korean “Comfort Women” of Wwii Essay –Cynthia Enloe In times of armed conflict, women are most susceptible to violence and silencing through the sexualization, dehumanization, and stigmatization of .
The book deals with the thousands of Japanese, Korean, Chinese and other Asian and European women who were victims of organized sexual violence and prostitution by means of “comfort stations” setup by the Japanese military during World War II.
Essay on Korean Comfort Women Words | 11 Pages Comfort women, or ianfu as they are called in Korean, are females who were forced sex slaves for the Japanese Imperial Army (Chunghee).
Nov 15, · The Comfort Women and Japan’s War on Truth Army and Navy officers across the Indo-Pacific both before and during World War II, as a matter of policy. unverified testimonies of 16 Korean.
Essay on Korean Comfort Women Words 11 Pages Comfort women, or ianfu as they are called in Korean, are females who were forced sex slaves for the Japanese Imperial Army (Chunghee).