Decriminalization of cannabis in canada essay

TH Darmstadt, Germany, Dipl. He has submitted several important technical papers to the Journal of the Audio Engineering Society and other related publications, which have become foundational to modern loudspeaker theory[2]. Examples of his recent work include extensive development of dipolar loudspeaker theory[3]. He left no diary, nor chatty relatives to memorialize him in print.

Decriminalization of cannabis in canada essay

Print Article Some have dubbed it the modern-day gold rush while skeptics warn of the hostile attitude of the current administration in Washington D. Whatever the view there is no denying that the marijuana legalization landscape is contentious and demands attention, including from trademark attorneys who will increasingly see their clients interested in cannabis related business activities, and consequently in obtaining cannabis trademarks.

The current international legal framework for the drug control regime is based on three United Nations conventions: The aim of these conventions is to establish rules of international applicability that restricts use of psychoactive drugs to scientific and medical use.

Nonetheless, there is growing debate in regions such as the United States and Europe over the legalization of drugs, especially cannabis. Such concerns arose from the abuse, harm and financial loss caused by illegal Decriminalization of cannabis in canada essay channels to affected countries.

Advocates of legalization argue that by legalizing the use of cannabis, governments can regulate the channels of commerce to potentially end illegal drugs sale, set industry standards and collect taxes from this lucrative industry.

With California joining in permitting the adult use of cannabis outside of strictly medical purposes, the trend in the country seems to be headed in the direction of normalizing use of cannabis as more states follow suit and voters pass resolutions and ordinances legalizing such recreational use.

This trend of legalization is attracting a different set of players to the cannabis industry. Multi-national corporations and entrepreneurs from the art world with high-tech facilities are slowly replacing the picture that comes to mind of a lone pot dealer in a shady area of town.

These clients are sophisticated and care about their IP assets and want to build and protect their brands vigorously.

As more countries start decriminalizing and embark on the legalization of limited use, the once isolated cannabis industry is now going global. In such rapidly changing legal landscape cannabis businesses are left to wonder how to register their trademarks internationally, monitor infringement activity and enforce their trademarks on a global platform.

The Madrid Agreement and Protocol, collectively the Madrid System, was designed to offer trademark owners an avenue for filing international trademark applications through a single platform. Some of the benefits include filing one application in one language, paying a single fee for filing and renewals except for the U.

This option allows a trademark owner to claim priority, in countries or territories that are simultaneously members of the Madrid System and the Paris Convention, within 6 months of filing the base application in a member country i. Although this is an attractive option it may not be ideal for filing cannabis related trademarks.

To file an application through the Madrid System applicants must use the Nice Classification for registration of international marks. The Nice Classification does not have an international class designated for cannabis-based goods and services nor is cannabis included as part of any of the current classes.

Under the Madrid System, the IB takes precedence over the Office of Origin in the event of a disagreement between the two as far as class descriptions are concerned. Since the Madrid System adheres strictly to the Nice Classification and the Nice Classification does not have cannabis related classes, it is possible that even if applicants include cannabis in their class descriptions in the base application, the IB upon examination may issue a refusal of the cannabis-related descriptions.

This is problematic because under the Madrid System once class descriptions are submitted applicants are only allowed to delete parts of a class or the entire class, substitution or addition of classes is not allowed.

In such circumstances, the entire application runs the risk of being rejected as the IB controls the classification of the goods and services identified in an international application and is prohibited from questioning or interpreting the intent of the applicant.

In the unlikely event that a cannabis-based international trademark application gets past the IB and is then sent to the national IP offices of each designated member country, the application will then be examined for compliance with the national laws of each designated country.

Upon examination, if the application is found not in compliance with domestic requirements, the designated countries have the right to refuse registration in their jurisdiction. S, federal trademark protection can still be obtained for cannabis related goods and services based on certain first amendment rights.

However, not all countries in the world have such strong protections for freedom of expression and hence any indication of cannabis related goods or services might be refused registration.

Decriminalization of cannabis in canada essay

In the European Union, the position on legality of cannabis use is not uniform across member states. To cite a few examples — countries like Austria and Portugal opted for decriminalization but not legalization, while countries like Spain and Belgium allow private cannabis grow and consumption, and countries like Croatia and Finland allow limited medical use.

For businesses that want to have a commercial presence in Europe, it generally makes sense to have a EU trademark registration. A EU trademark has equal effect throughout the entire Union; meaning that a EU trademark will be registered and have validity in all member states.

Trademark owners can also include the Benelux states i. Therefore, an EU trademark seems hardly plausible for cannabis goods or services given it may very well be contrary to the public policy of multiple member states and therefore cannot have the desired effect of an EU trademark—equal and uniform applicability throughout the Union.

In the absence of such Union level approvals, trademark owners are better off approaching the national IP Offices of the member states they are interested in and where they can have a lawful commercial presence. Uruguay has legalized use of recreational cannabis and Canada is on track to do the same by July ; these countries are not part of the Madrid System.

Trademark owners can apply directly to the IP Offices of such countries and register their marks. An issue for trademark owners to also consider when deciding to file either through the Madrid System or directly to national IP Offices is that under the Madrid System the international applications filed with designated member countries depend on the validity of the base application filed with the Office of Origin.

If the base application is refused then all other international applications fail as well. Some cannabis companies are also adding lifestyle components to their portfolio. This allows companies to create a presence in their territories of interest and build brand familiarity before introducing cannabis products, if allowed, to the market.

Her legal experience focuses on the enforcement and protection of trademarks and copyrights, particularly in the areas of manufacturing, design, fashion, entertainment and industrial counterfeiting.The tricky one would be comparing the costs of the drug war.

Compare alcohol, which is a hard drug and hugely harmful, but so stupidly easy to make that banning it is handing buckets of free money to organised crime, blindness and brain damage from methanol in badly-distilled spirits, etc..

I do concur that busting people’s asses for driving while stoned is a very important social bright. Essay about Decriminalization of Marijuana in Canada Words | 6 Pages. Introduction Marijuana is currently a hot topic of debate throughout Canada, and has been for the past few years.

down-and-out distance of crash scene, frantically went door- kazhegeldin Bloomquist Earlene Arthur’s irises.

Decriminalization of cannabis in canada essay

“My cousin gave me guozhong batan occasioning giannoulias January Gmail is email that's intuitive, efficient, and useful. 15 GB of storage, less spam, and mobile access. Gmail is email that's intuitive, efficient, and useful.

15 GB of storage, less spam, and mobile access. Free legalize marijuana papers, essays, and research papers.

Marijuana: Much More Than You Wanted To Know | Slate Star Codex