A discussion on affirmative action

Affirmative action in China There is affirmative action in education for minority nationalities. This may equate to lowering minimum requirements for the National University Entrance Examination, which is a mandatory exam for all students to enter university. Israel[ edit ] A class-based affirmative action policy was incorporated into the admission practices of the four most selective universities in Israel during the early to mids.

A discussion on affirmative action

Affirmative Action and Financial Aid Affirmative action is often defined as the effort to improve access to higher education for minority and female students.

It is typically implemented through special recruitment efforts and by giving special preferences to minorities. For example, given two comparable candidates, affirmative action chooses the minority candidate over the non-minority candidate.

Some of the key goals of affirmative action are to correct past discrimination at the college or university, to provide access to education to qualified and talented students of every race especially underrepresented minority studentsto A discussion on affirmative action the playing field by compensating for or eliminating current cultural biases against minority students such as those inherent in standardized academic testsand to create diversity in the academic environment.

Diversity, in particular, can improve the educational experience of all students by promoting a variety of perspectives and a robust and enlightening exchange of ideas and viewpoints. This document presents a lay interpretation of the laws and court cases affecting affirmative action, and does not provide legal advice nor is it intended to provide legal advice.

All colleges, universities and race-based scholarship sponsors should have their admissions and financial aid policies reviewed by a qualified attorney. Federal Law Current US Supreme Court rulings permit public colleges and universities to consider race in college admissions and financial aid when it furthers "a compelling interest of the state in obtaining educational benefits that derive from a diverse student body".

Race may be considered as part of a holistic and flexible individual review process, but not as part of an automated mechanical process based on points or quotas.

A discussion on affirmative action

Race needs to be considered for more than just simple ethnic diversity. The focus must be on the educational benefits that derive from a diverse student body, and diversity must consider not only race but also other characteristics that contribute to diversity.

Educational benefits can include cross-racial understanding, the different perspectives of students who have experienced discrimination and related disadvantages, the breakdown of racial stereotypes, and the promotion of effective participation by all racial and ethnic groups.

Race may also be considered to compensate for actual past discrimination at the college or university. The discrimination must have occurred at the educational institution and not just in the local community or society at large.

The remedy must be in proportion to the past discrimination and thereby limited in duration. The US Supreme Court rulings give more detail on how to structure affirmative action processes in a constitutional manner, but the guidance is still somewhat limited, as follows: The US Supreme Court rulings apply to all public institutions and any private institution which receives federal funding.

One of the most controversial issues in the discussion of race relations in the U.S. is that of affirmative action. Not only are different racial/ethnic groups arguing with each other over this topic but many times, members of the same racial/ethnic group can't agree with each other over it. Sep 04,  · Students discuss the pros and cons of affirmative action. Should we try to correct for inequality in educational backgrounds by taking race into . The debate over affirmative action raises two primary questions: Is American society so characterized by bias that race-based preferences are necessary to help people of color succeed?

State Law Several states have passed state restrictions on the use of race in college admissions and financial aid. Since the US Supreme Court rulings permit the use of race in certain situations but do not mandate it, it is possible for individual states to pass more restrictive laws.

The following states have passed laws further restricting the use of race in college admissions and financial aid. Proposition bans the use of race in college admissions and financial aid at California state colleges and universities through an amendment to the state constitution.

The key clause of Proposition states: The state shall not discriminate against, or grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting.

Proposition permits colleges to continue to administer awards if the use of race or gender is required in order to receive Federal funds. Florida Government Jeb Bush signed an executive order in November eliminating the use of race and ethnicity in college admissions to the state university system.

Instead, the state adopted the "Talented 20 Program" which guarantees admission to students graduating in the top 20 percent of their classes and completing a specific minimum high-school curriculum.

The language is sufficiently broad as to affect both college admissions and financial aid: Similar language applies to the state, its political subdivisions and instrumentalities.

The amendment to the state constitution went into effect on December 23, Note that these state laws only apply to public institutions, not private colleges and universities. The argument that private colleges and universities are affected by the ruling hinges on Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of CRAwhich bans discrimination on the basis of race at any institution that receives federal funds.Affirmative Action Regulations Abstract: Affirmative Action Regulations Sections 46a through 74 inclusive ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS Regulations provided below are for informational purposes ONLY.

For official citations please refer to the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies. COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND OPPORTUNITIES AFFIRMATIVE ACTION BY STATE .

A discussion on affirmative action

Aug 02,  · A lawsuit against Harvard raises the issue of whether there has been discrimination against Asian-Americans in the name of creating a diverse student body. Affirmative Action: Equality or Reverse Discrimination?

Affirmative action is a program that serves to rectify the effects of purportedly past societal discrimination by allocating jobs and opportunities to minorities and women. More Americans believe that affirmative action, instead of leveling the playfield for minorities, unfairly punishes whites.

A reverse discrimination case is before the Supreme Court. Affirmative action, also known as reservation in India and Nepal, positive action in the UK, and employment equity (in a narrower context) in Canada and South Africa, is the policy of promoting the education and employment of members of groups that are known to have previously suffered from discrimination.

[BINGSNIPMIX-3

Historically and internationally, support for affirmative action has sought to achieve. While she did mention how Asian-American students were suing Harvard University for their higher standards, Jackson gave no explanation of how they blamed affirmative action for the alleged discrimination.A group of Asian-American students suing Harvard University, accusing the school of unfairly giving preference to other racial minorities.

Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin :: U.S. ___ () :: Justia US Supreme Court Center